RustFSvssupabase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| RustFS | supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Storage | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 35 504 | 114 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 772 | +3 551 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 8 |
| Latest release | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 74/100 for RustFS, so it is the safer default.
supabase ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for RustFS.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 551 stars in 30 days).
RustFS details →supabase details →
Swap a project
Keep RustFS, compare it with
Keep supabase, compare it with