automqvssupabase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| automq | supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 12 in Message Broker | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 10 920 | 114 278 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +62 | +3 530 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 8 |
| Latest release | 1.7.4 · 29 Aug 2026 | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 68/100 for automq, so it is the safer default.
automq ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 530 stars in 30 days).
automq details →supabase details →
Swap a project
Keep automq, compare it with
Keep supabase, compare it with