RustFSvsStash
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| RustFS | Stash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Storage | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 35 502 | 13 308 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 770 | +302 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 7 |
| Latest release | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Stash scores 78/100 against 74/100 for RustFS, so it is the safer default.
Stash ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for RustFS.
If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; RustFS needs more configuration.
RustFS is growing faster right now (+1 770 stars in 30 days).
RustFS details →Stash details →
Swap a project
Keep RustFS, compare it with
Keep Stash, compare it with