glusterfsvsStash
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| glusterfs | Stash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 7 in Distributed Storage | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 266 | 13 308 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +24 | +302 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 7 |
| Latest release | — | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Stash scores 78/100 against 63/100 for glusterfs, so it is the safer default.
Stash ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for glusterfs.
If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; glusterfs needs more configuration.
Stash is growing faster right now (+302 stars in 30 days).
glusterfs details →Stash details →
Swap a project
Keep glusterfs, compare it with
Keep Stash, compare it with