RustDesk ServervsTurtl
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| RustDesk Server | Turtl | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 22 in Remote Desktop | #47 of 81 in Notes & Editors |
| GitHub stars | 10 632 | 631 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +176 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 0 |
| Latest release | 1.1.16 · 20 Jul 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
RustDesk Server scores 74/100 against 47/100 for Turtl, so it is the safer default.
RustDesk Server ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Turtl.
If you want the quickest setup, RustDesk Server is easier to run; Turtl needs more configuration.
RustDesk Server is growing faster right now (+176 stars in 30 days).
RustDesk Server details →Turtl details →
Swap a project
Keep RustDesk Server, compare it with
Keep Turtl, compare it with