rudderstackvsWorld Monitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| rudderstack | World Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Customer Data Platform | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 4 508 | 89 719 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +20 | +2 430 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 39 | 17 |
| Latest release | v1.92.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
World Monitor scores 86/100 against 63/100 for rudderstack, so it is the safer default.
rudderstack ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for World Monitor.
World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 430 stars in 30 days).
rudderstack details →World Monitor details →
Swap a project
Keep rudderstack, compare it with
Keep World Monitor, compare it with