multiwovenvsWorld Monitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| multiwoven | World Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 8 in Data Pipeline | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 1 683 | 89 721 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +2 382 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 | 17 |
| Latest release | v0.136.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
World Monitor scores 86/100 against 57/100 for multiwoven, so it is the safer default.
multiwoven ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for World Monitor.
World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 382 stars in 30 days).
multiwoven details →World Monitor details →
Swap a project
Keep multiwoven, compare it with
Keep World Monitor, compare it with