rudderstackvstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| rudderstack | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Customer Data Platform | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 4 508 | 24 053 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +20 | +775 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 39 | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.92.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 64/100 for rudderstack, so it is the safer default.
rudderstack ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for temporal.
temporal is growing faster right now (+775 stars in 30 days).
rudderstack details →temporal details →
Swap a project
Keep rudderstack, compare it with
Keep temporal, compare it with