multiwovenvstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| multiwoven | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 8 in Data Pipeline | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 1 683 | 24 057 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +779 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 | 11 |
| Latest release | v0.136.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Ruby | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 57/100 for multiwoven, so it is the safer default.
multiwoven ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for temporal.
temporal is growing faster right now (+779 stars in 30 days).
multiwoven details →temporal details →
Swap a project
Keep multiwoven, compare it with
Keep temporal, compare it with