rpi-mqtt-monitorvsWBO
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| rpi-mqtt-monitor | WBO | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #58 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 328 | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 4 |
| Latest release | 1.4.3 · 18 Jun 2026 | v2.18.26 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
WBO scores 61/100 against 51/100 for rpi-mqtt-monitor, so it is the safer default.
rpi-mqtt-monitor ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for WBO.
If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; rpi-mqtt-monitor needs more configuration.
WBO is growing faster right now (+17 stars in 30 days).
rpi-mqtt-monitor details →WBO details →
Swap a project
Keep rpi-mqtt-monitor, compare it with
Keep WBO, compare it with