rpi-mqtt-monitorvsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| rpi-mqtt-monitor | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #58 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 328 | 17 183 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +-1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 0 |
| Latest release | 1.4.3 · 18 Jun 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 51/100 for rpi-mqtt-monitor, so it is the safer default.
rpi-mqtt-monitor ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; rpi-mqtt-monitor needs more configuration.
rpi-mqtt-monitor details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep rpi-mqtt-monitor, compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with