rpi-mqtt-monitorvsTypst
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| rpi-mqtt-monitor | Typst | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #58 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 328 | 56 869 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +140 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 5 |
| Latest release | 1.4.3 · 18 Jun 2026 | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Typst scores 82/100 against 51/100 for rpi-mqtt-monitor, so it is the safer default.
rpi-mqtt-monitor ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Typst.
If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; rpi-mqtt-monitor needs more configuration.
Typst is growing faster right now (+140 stars in 30 days).
rpi-mqtt-monitor details →Typst details →
Swap a project
Keep rpi-mqtt-monitor, compare it with
Keep Typst, compare it with