rpi-mqtt-monitorvsTypesense
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| rpi-mqtt-monitor | Typesense | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #58 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #6 of 41 in Search Engines |
| GitHub stars | 328 | 27 063 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +477 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 4 |
| Latest release | 1.4.3 · 18 Jun 2026 | v30.2 · 19 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | C |
Which one should you pick?
Typesense scores 79/100 against 51/100 for rpi-mqtt-monitor, so it is the safer default.
rpi-mqtt-monitor ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Typesense.
If you want the quickest setup, Typesense is easier to run; rpi-mqtt-monitor needs more configuration.
Typesense is growing faster right now (+477 stars in 30 days).
rpi-mqtt-monitor details →Typesense details →
Swap a project
Keep rpi-mqtt-monitor, compare it with
Keep Typesense, compare it with