rpi-mqtt-monitorvssupabase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| rpi-mqtt-monitor | supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #58 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 328 | 114 255 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +3 546 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 8 |
| Latest release | 1.4.3 · 18 Jun 2026 | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 51/100 for rpi-mqtt-monitor, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, rpi-mqtt-monitor is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 546 stars in 30 days).
rpi-mqtt-monitor details →supabase details →
Swap a project
Keep rpi-mqtt-monitor, compare it with
Keep supabase, compare it with