rpi-mqtt-monitorvsSRS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| rpi-mqtt-monitor | SRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #58 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #4 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 328 | 29 390 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +111 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 13 |
| Latest release | 1.4.3 · 18 Jun 2026 | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | C |
Which one should you pick?
SRS scores 78/100 against 51/100 for rpi-mqtt-monitor, so it is the safer default.
SRS ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for rpi-mqtt-monitor.
SRS is growing faster right now (+111 stars in 30 days).
rpi-mqtt-monitor details →SRS details →
Swap a project
Keep rpi-mqtt-monitor, compare it with
Keep SRS, compare it with