rpi-mqtt-monitorvssentry
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| rpi-mqtt-monitor | sentry | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #58 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 328 | 45 672 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +840 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 22 |
| Latest release | 1.4.3 · 18 Jun 2026 | 26.10.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
sentry scores 80/100 against 51/100 for rpi-mqtt-monitor, so it is the safer default.
sentry ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for rpi-mqtt-monitor.
If you want the quickest setup, rpi-mqtt-monitor is easier to run; sentry needs more configuration.
sentry is growing faster right now (+840 stars in 30 days).
rpi-mqtt-monitor details →sentry details →
Swap a project
Keep rpi-mqtt-monitor, compare it with
Keep sentry, compare it with