rpi-mqtt-monitorvsSecPi
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| rpi-mqtt-monitor | SecPi | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 42/100 |
| Rank in category | #58 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #84 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 329 | 262 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 0 |
| Latest release | 1.4.3 · 18 Jun 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
rpi-mqtt-monitor scores 51/100 against 42/100 for SecPi, so it is the safer default.
rpi-mqtt-monitor ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for SecPi.
If you want the quickest setup, rpi-mqtt-monitor is easier to run; SecPi needs more configuration.
rpi-mqtt-monitor details →SecPi details →
Swap a project
Keep rpi-mqtt-monitor, compare it with
Keep SecPi, compare it with