RocketshipvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Rocketship | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 43/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 10 in Testing | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 182 | 117 816 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +5 457 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 11 |
| Latest release | v0.5.43 · 18 Jan 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 43/100 for Rocketship, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Rocketship.
If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; Rocketship needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 457 stars in 30 days).
Rocketship details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep Rocketship, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with