LocustvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Locust | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 10 in Testing | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 28 246 | 117 848 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +68 | +5 489 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 11 |
| Latest release | 2.47.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 78/100 for Locust, so it is the safer default.
Locust ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
If you want the quickest setup, Locust is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 489 stars in 30 days).
Locust details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep Locust, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with