retroassemblyvsWarpgate
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| retroassembly | Warpgate | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 5 in Emulation | #11 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 1 153 | 8 159 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +71 | +199 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 33 |
| Latest release | v7.260719.1051 · 19 Jul 2026 | v0.30.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Warpgate scores 75/100 against 56/100 for retroassembly, so it is the safer default.
Warpgate ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for retroassembly.
Warpgate is growing faster right now (+199 stars in 30 days).
retroassembly details →Warpgate details →