retroassemblyvsRomM
Two self-hosted Emulation projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| retroassembly | RomM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 5 in Emulation | #1 of 5 in Emulation |
| GitHub stars | 1 153 | 14 096 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +71 | +940 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 10 |
| Latest release | v7.260719.1051 · 19 Jul 2026 | 5.4.1 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
RomM scores 81/100 against 56/100 for retroassembly, so it is the safer default.
RomM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for retroassembly.
If you want the quickest setup, retroassembly is easier to run; RomM needs more configuration.
RomM is growing faster right now (+940 stars in 30 days).
retroassembly details →RomM details →All Emulation projects →
Swap a project
Keep retroassembly, compare it with
Keep RomM, compare it with