retroassemblyvsVigil365
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| retroassembly | Vigil365 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 5 in Emulation | #46 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 1 153 | 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +71 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 2 |
| Latest release | v7.260719.1051 · 19 Jul 2026 | v1.1.0 · 28 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | C# |
Which one should you pick?
retroassembly scores 56/100 against 49/100 for Vigil365, so it is the safer default.
retroassembly ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Vigil365.
If you want the quickest setup, retroassembly is easier to run; Vigil365 needs more configuration.
retroassembly is growing faster right now (+71 stars in 30 days).
retroassembly details →Vigil365 details →