retroassemblyvsTrilium Notes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| retroassembly | Trilium Notes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 5 in Emulation | #2 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 153 | 38 608 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +72 | +633 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 14 |
| Latest release | v7.260719.1051 · 19 Jul 2026 | v0.106.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Trilium Notes scores 83/100 against 56/100 for retroassembly, so it is the safer default.
Trilium Notes ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for retroassembly.
If you want the quickest setup, retroassembly is easier to run; Trilium Notes needs more configuration.
Trilium Notes is growing faster right now (+633 stars in 30 days).
retroassembly details →Trilium Notes details →