retroassemblyvsTrenova
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| retroassembly | Trenova | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 5 in Emulation | #2 of 2 in Fleet Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 153 | 314 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +72 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 9 |
| Latest release | v7.260719.1051 · 19 Jul 2026 | v0.10.5 · 13 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
retroassembly scores 56/100 against 41/100 for Trenova, so it is the safer default.
Trenova ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for retroassembly.
If you want the quickest setup, retroassembly is easier to run; Trenova needs more configuration.
retroassembly is growing faster right now (+72 stars in 30 days).
retroassembly details →Trenova details →