Request TrackervsWBO
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Request Tracker | WBO | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Helpdesk | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 1 164 | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 8 |
| Latest release | rt-5.0.10 · 1 Jun 2026 | v2.18.31 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Perl | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Request Tracker scores 65/100 against 61/100 for WBO, so it is the safer default.
WBO ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Request Tracker.
If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; Request Tracker needs more configuration.
WBO is growing faster right now (+18 stars in 30 days).
Request Tracker details →WBO details →
Swap a project
Keep Request Tracker, compare it with
Keep WBO, compare it with