Request TrackervsTailscale
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Request Tracker | Tailscale | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 84/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Helpdesk | #1 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 1 164 | 38 280 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +1 438 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 14 |
| Latest release | rt-5.0.10 · 1 Jun 2026 | v1.104.4 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-2.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | Perl | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Tailscale scores 84/100 against 65/100 for Request Tracker, so it is the safer default.
Tailscale ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Request Tracker.
If you want the quickest setup, Tailscale is easier to run; Request Tracker needs more configuration.
Tailscale is growing faster right now (+1 438 stars in 30 days).
Request Tracker details →Tailscale details →
Swap a project
Keep Request Tracker, compare it with
Keep Tailscale, compare it with