Request TrackervsSeaweedFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Request Tracker | SeaweedFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Helpdesk | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 1 164 | 35 803 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +842 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 28 |
| Latest release | rt-5.0.10 · 1 Jun 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Perl | Go |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 65/100 for Request Tracker, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Request Tracker.
If you want the quickest setup, SeaweedFS is easier to run; Request Tracker needs more configuration.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+842 stars in 30 days).
Request Tracker details →SeaweedFS details →
Swap a project
Keep Request Tracker, compare it with
Keep SeaweedFS, compare it with