Rembgvssupabase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Rembg | supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 13 in Image Processing | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 25 216 | 114 258 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +77 | +3 549 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 8 |
| Latest release | v2.0.86 · 21 Oct 2026 | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 78/100 for Rembg, so it is the safer default.
Rembg ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.
If you want the quickest setup, Rembg is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 549 stars in 30 days).
Rembg details →supabase details →
Swap a project
Keep Rembg, compare it with
Keep supabase, compare it with