CompreFacevsRembg
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| CompreFace | Rembg | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #18 of 125 in AI | #1 of 13 in Image Processing |
| GitHub stars | 8 387 | 25 214 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +59 | +75 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 |
| Latest release | — | v2.0.86 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Rembg scores 78/100 against 70/100 for CompreFace, so it is the safer default.
Rembg ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for CompreFace.
If you want the quickest setup, Rembg is easier to run; CompreFace needs more configuration.
CompreFace details →Rembg details →
Swap a project
Keep CompreFace, compare it with
Keep Rembg, compare it with