imgproxyvssupabase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| imgproxy | supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 13 in Image Processing | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 11 159 | 114 252 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +67 | +3 543 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 8 |
| Latest release | v4.0.20 · 26 Oct 2026 | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 72/100 for imgproxy, so it is the safer default.
imgproxy ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.
If you want the quickest setup, imgproxy is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 543 stars in 30 days).
imgproxy details →supabase details →
Swap a project
Keep imgproxy, compare it with
Keep supabase, compare it with