RedashvsWarpgate
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Redash | Warpgate | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #11 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 28 850 | 8 159 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +42 | +199 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 33 |
| Latest release | v26.9.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | v0.30.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Redash scores 76/100 against 75/100 for Warpgate, so it is the safer default.
Warpgate ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Redash.
If you want the quickest setup, Warpgate is easier to run; Redash needs more configuration.
Warpgate is growing faster right now (+199 stars in 30 days).
Redash details →Warpgate details →
Swap a project
Keep Redash, compare it with
Keep Warpgate, compare it with