MetabasevsWarpgate
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Metabase | Warpgate | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #11 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 49 911 | 8 159 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +513 | +199 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 | 33 |
| Latest release | v0.64.1 · 6 Oct 2026 | v0.30.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Clojure | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Metabase scores 83/100 against 75/100 for Warpgate, so it is the safer default.
Warpgate ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 30 for Metabase.
If you want the quickest setup, Warpgate is easier to run; Metabase needs more configuration.
Metabase is growing faster right now (+513 stars in 30 days).
Metabase details →Warpgate details →
Swap a project
Keep Metabase, compare it with
Keep Warpgate, compare it with