rebacklogsvsVert
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| rebacklogs | Vert | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 43/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #36 of 45 in Project Management | #2 of 10 in File Conversion |
| GitHub stars | 184 | 16 170 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +540 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | v4.3.3 · 6 Apr 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Vert scores 71/100 against 43/100 for rebacklogs, so it is the safer default.
rebacklogs ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Vert.
If you want the quickest setup, Vert is easier to run; rebacklogs needs more configuration.
Vert is growing faster right now (+540 stars in 30 days).
rebacklogs details →Vert details →