Audiobookshelfvsscanopy
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Audiobookshelf | scanopy | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #1 of 10 in Network |
| GitHub stars | 14 837 | 5 915 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +417 | +121 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 40 |
| Latest release | v2.37.2 · 23 Oct 2026 | v0.19.3 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Audiobookshelf scores 79/100 against 64/100 for scanopy, so it is the safer default.
scanopy ships more often: 40 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for Audiobookshelf.
If you want the quickest setup, Audiobookshelf is easier to run; scanopy needs more configuration.
Audiobookshelf is growing faster right now (+417 stars in 30 days).
Audiobookshelf details →scanopy details →
Swap a project
Keep Audiobookshelf, compare it with
Keep scanopy, compare it with