BentoPDFvstrigger
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BentoPDF | trigger | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 16 176 | 16 644 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +477 | +257 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 49 |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 | v4.8.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
BentoPDF scores 77/100 against 76/100 for trigger, so it is the safer default.
trigger ships more often: 49 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for BentoPDF.
If you want the quickest setup, BentoPDF is easier to run; trigger needs more configuration.
BentoPDF details →trigger details →
Swap a project
Keep BentoPDF, compare it with
Keep trigger, compare it with