Reactive ResumevsSonarQube
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Reactive Resume | SonarQube | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #2 of 10 in Code Review |
| GitHub stars | 45 040 | 11 125 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 639 | +103 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 | 12 |
| Latest release | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 | 26.10.0.133078 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 71/100 for SonarQube, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for SonarQube.
If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; SonarQube needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 639 stars in 30 days).
Reactive Resume details →SonarQube details →
Swap a project
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with
Keep SonarQube, compare it with