Reactive Resumevsrpi-mqtt-monitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Reactive Resume | rpi-mqtt-monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #58 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 45 030 | 328 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 629 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 | 8 |
| Latest release | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | 1.4.3 · 18 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 51/100 for rpi-mqtt-monitor, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for rpi-mqtt-monitor.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 629 stars in 30 days).
Reactive Resume details →rpi-mqtt-monitor details →
Swap a project
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with
Keep rpi-mqtt-monitor, compare it with