Entevsrpi-mqtt-monitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Ente | rpi-mqtt-monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in Photo Management | #58 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 29 729 | 328 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +669 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 | 8 |
| Latest release | ente-cli-v0.4.2 · 27 Oct 2026 | 1.4.3 · 18 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Dart | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Ente scores 82/100 against 51/100 for rpi-mqtt-monitor, so it is the safer default.
Ente ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for rpi-mqtt-monitor.
Ente is growing faster right now (+669 stars in 30 days).
Ente details →rpi-mqtt-monitor details →
Swap a project
Keep Ente, compare it with
Keep rpi-mqtt-monitor, compare it with