RadarrvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Radarr | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 45 in Download Management | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 14 667 | 117 704 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +243 | +5 345 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 11 |
| Latest release | v7.0.0.10815 · 25 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 78/100 for Radarr, so it is the safer default.
Radarr ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
If you want the quickest setup, Radarr is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 345 stars in 30 days).
Radarr details →TradingAgents details →