MeTubevsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MeTube | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 45 in Download Management | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 15 124 | 117 704 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +287 | +5 345 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 48 | 11 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.27 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 76/100 for MeTube, so it is the safer default.
MeTube ships more often: 48 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
If you want the quickest setup, MeTube is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 345 stars in 30 days).
MeTube details →TradingAgents details →