cobaltvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| cobalt | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 45 in Download Management | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 45 586 | 117 704 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 802 | +5 345 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 |
| Latest release | — | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Svelte | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 83/100 for cobalt, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for cobalt.
If you want the quickest setup, cobalt is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 345 stars in 30 days).
cobalt details →TradingAgents details →