RabbitMQvsSuper Productivity
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| RabbitMQ | Super Productivity | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Message Broker | #1 of 34 in Task Management |
| GitHub stars | 13 950 | 23 254 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +75 | +1 014 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 22 |
| Latest release | v4.3.7 · 20 Oct 2026 | v19.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Super Productivity scores 83/100 against 77/100 for RabbitMQ, so it is the safer default.
Super Productivity ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for RabbitMQ.
If you want the quickest setup, Super Productivity is easier to run; RabbitMQ needs more configuration.
Super Productivity is growing faster right now (+1 014 stars in 30 days).
RabbitMQ details →Super Productivity details →
Swap a project
Keep RabbitMQ, compare it with
Keep Super Productivity, compare it with