NATSvsSuper Productivity
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| NATS | Super Productivity | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Message Broker | #1 of 34 in Task Management |
| GitHub stars | 20 959 | 23 254 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +194 | +1 014 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 22 |
| Latest release | v2.14.9 · 26 Oct 2026 | v19.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Super Productivity scores 83/100 against 80/100 for NATS, so it is the safer default.
Super Productivity ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for NATS.
If you want the quickest setup, Super Productivity is easier to run; NATS needs more configuration.
Super Productivity is growing faster right now (+1 014 stars in 30 days).
NATS details →Super Productivity details →
Swap a project
Keep NATS, compare it with
Keep Super Productivity, compare it with