quackbackvsrsyslog
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| quackback | rsyslog | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 14 in Customer Support | #2 of 8 in Logging |
| GitHub stars | 331 | 2 344 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +8 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 4 |
| Latest release | v0.14.1 · 7 Oct 2026 | v8.2610.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | C |
Which one should you pick?
rsyslog scores 67/100 against 50/100 for quackback, so it is the safer default.
quackback ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for rsyslog.
If you want the quickest setup, quackback is easier to run; rsyslog needs more configuration.
rsyslog is growing faster right now (+8 stars in 30 days).
quackback details →rsyslog details →