quackbackvsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| quackback | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 14 in Customer Support | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 331 | 45 030 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 629 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 34 |
| Latest release | v0.14.1 · 7 Oct 2026 | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 50/100 for quackback, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for quackback.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 629 stars in 30 days).
quackback details →Reactive Resume details →