QMReadervsVert
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| QMReader | Vert | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #41 of 85 in Feed Reader | #2 of 10 in File Conversion |
| GitHub stars | 261 | 16 174 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +541 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.0.14 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Vert scores 71/100 against 47/100 for QMReader, so it is the safer default.
QMReader ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Vert.
If you want the quickest setup, Vert is easier to run; QMReader needs more configuration.
Vert is growing faster right now (+541 stars in 30 days).
QMReader details →Vert details →