QMReadervsStirling-PDF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| QMReader | Stirling-PDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #41 of 85 in Feed Reader | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 261 | 95 289 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 327 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 25 |
| Latest release | v1.0.14 · 28 Oct 2026 | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 47/100 for QMReader, so it is the safer default.
Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for QMReader.
Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 327 stars in 30 days).
QMReader details →Stirling-PDF details →