QloAppsvsStirling-PDF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| QloApps | Stirling-PDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 8 in Scheduling & Booking | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 14 451 | 95 273 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +65 | +2 311 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 25 |
| Latest release | — | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | OSL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | PHP | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 68/100 for QloApps, so it is the safer default.
Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for QloApps.
Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 311 stars in 30 days).
QloApps details →Stirling-PDF details →
Swap a project
Keep QloApps, compare it with
Keep Stirling-PDF, compare it with