QinglongvsQloApps
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Qinglong | QloApps | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 34 in Task Management | #2 of 8 in Scheduling & Booking |
| GitHub stars | 20 020 | 14 451 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +66 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 0 |
| Latest release | upgrade-master · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | OSL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
Qinglong scores 69/100 against 68/100 for QloApps, so it is the safer default.
Qinglong ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for QloApps.
If you want the quickest setup, Qinglong is easier to run; QloApps needs more configuration.
QloApps is growing faster right now (+66 stars in 30 days).
Qinglong details →QloApps details →
Swap a project
Keep Qinglong, compare it with
Keep QloApps, compare it with