QFieldCloudvsunsloth
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| QFieldCloud | unsloth | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 54/100 | 85/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 9 in Mapping & GPS | #1 of 7 in Local AI |
| GitHub stars | 246 | 78 720 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +2 063 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 2 |
| Latest release | v26.29 · 23 Oct 2026 | prebuilt-wheels-cu13 · 27 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
unsloth scores 85/100 against 54/100 for QFieldCloud, so it is the safer default.
QFieldCloud ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for unsloth.
If you want the quickest setup, unsloth is easier to run; QFieldCloud needs more configuration.
unsloth is growing faster right now (+2 063 stars in 30 days).
QFieldCloud details →unsloth details →
Swap a project
Keep QFieldCloud, compare it with
Keep unsloth, compare it with